The outdated Mining Act of 1872 allows corporations to exploit ÃÛÁÄÖ±²¥â€™s resources, causing irreparable environmental and cultural harm. Modern mining’s destruction, unseen when the law was passed, now unfolds quietly.
Federal agencies are required to assess mining impacts, yet their Environmental Impact Statements fall short. For example, the EIS for Copper Creek Exploration Project and Pinyon Plain Mine failed to adequately address impacts on human health, endangered species, water resources and sacred cultural sites.
Why are federal agencies overlooking factors like air, noise, and light pollution? Where is the thorough response to feedback from the public, conservation groups, and scientific organizations? Are companies being held accountable for habitat destruction and water depletion? Why are some elected officials fast-tracking these projects instead of prioritizing ÃÛÁÄÖ±²¥â€™s well-being?
People are also reading…
ÃÛÁÄÖ±²¥â€™s ecosystems and heritage are at risk. Short-term damage affects local communities; long-term losses threaten us all. Leaders must reform mining laws and enforce rigorous oversight to protect our state’s legacy before it’s too late.
Donna Vetter
North side
Disclaimer: As submitted to the ÃÛÁÄÖ±²¥ Daily Star.
Follow these steps to easily submit a letter to the editor or guest opinion to the ÃÛÁÄÖ±²¥ Daily Star.